- Will Lawyers In Canada Soon Face A Religious Test? The Hypersensitive Response Over Canada’s First Openly Christian Law School
- BC Law Society Approves TWU Law School Graduates
- The Cold Chill of the Legal Profession’s Rejection of Religious Freedom
- A Referendum On Religious Freedom
- Lawyers’ Referendum Not Just About TWU – It’s About Our Commitment To The Rule Of Law
- Called To Participate, But Not At The Table
- Hearing Update On Trinity Western University v. Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society
- Breaking News Supreme Court of Nova Scotia rules in favour of Trinity Western University …. more to come
- Space Enough For All: Nova Scotia Supreme Court Makes Decision on Trinity Western University Law School
- The Strange Case of Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society Appeal of the TWU Ruling
- CCCC Granted Intervener Status In TWU Case in British Columbia
- The Onward March of TWU: Next Step The Court of Appeal
- Trinity Western University and the Legal War of Attrition: Isn’t It Time To Let Diversity Flourish?
- Charitable Status of Un-Popular Opinion
- CCCC Denied Intervener Status at Ontario Court of Appeal
- CCCC Granted Intervener Status at the BC Court of Appeal on TWU Case
- Sending a Message to TWU: Your Graduates Need Not Apply
- Recent Happenings: CCCC Files Factum At BC Court of Appeal; Bussey appears on TV
- CCCC at the British Columbia Court of Appeal
- The Experts Demand Deference: Law Societies & TWU
- The Intolerance of Intolerance: The Outrageous Accusation That TWU’s School of Law Is Related To The Orlando Massacre
- Being On the Right Side of History: Where the Offended Take Away Religious Freedom
- Nova Scotia’s Highest Court Rules in Favour of TWU
- Common Sense Prevails at the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal
- Bussey on John Gormley Show
- Nova Scotia Barristers Society Will Not Appeal
- BC Court of Appeal On TWU
- Developing Story: BC Court of Appeal Rules 5-0 in favour of TWU
- The Decision That Has Changed Everything For TWU
- Law Society of BC Appeals TWU To Supreme Court of Canada
- Bussey in Vancouver Sun: Appeal court ruling on Trinity Western University is a game changer
- The Legal Revolution Against Religion
- Supreme Court Grants Leave On TWU
- Supreme Court Grants 9 But Denies 23 Groups Intervener Status In Landmark Case
- Canadian Council of Christian Charities Granted Intervener Status in TWU Case: The Supreme Court Changes Course On TWU Interveners
- Australian Group Interviews Bussey on Equality and Freedom of Religion
- Bruce Clemenger’s Video Message on TWU Case
- Oral Argument of CCCC on TWU at the Supreme Court of Canada
- June 15 TWU Decision To Be Released
- TWU Loses: Canada’s Religious Freedom Forever Altered
- The Constitutional Promise of Religious Freedom Betrayed
- TWU Drops Mandatory Community Covenant
On Friday, May 14, Chief Justice Hinkson granted Canadian Council of Christian Charities (CCCC) intervener status in the Trinity Western University (TWU) case against The Law Society of British Columbia (LSBC).
TWU is asking the BC Supreme Court to review the LSBC decision to reverse its original approval of the TWU School of Law. Without the LSBC approval TWU law graduates will not be permitted to practise law in BC. When LSBC first approved the School of Law it was following the lead of the Federation of Law Societies of Canada. However, opposition arose among a number of BC lawyers who disagreed with TWU’s admission requirement that students sign the Community Covenant to live in accordance with the school’s Biblical view of marriage as between one man and one woman.
CCCC will now have the privilege of assisting the BC Supreme Court in understanding the implications of this decision on the larger religious institutional context. We plan to argue that the LSBC decision is a rejection of the diversity of views and opinions in the country. It fails to appreciate the constitutional right of religious communities to decide for themselves their own internal organizational rules. Not everyone, or institution will have the same religious or moral position on such matters as marriage. Nor should we all be forced into one mold. We will argue that we are better off as a country to protect our institutional diversity and accept a plurality of voices and identities within the mosaic of Canadian culture. “Private” religious institutions are equally valuable members of Canadian society as are “public” secular institutions. Only together are they reflective of the face of Canada.
It was heartening to see the BC Court reject the approach of the Ontario Divisional Court last year in the TWU case against the Law Society of Upper Canada. The Divisional Court did not grant CCCC intervener status in that case as noted in a previous blog. That was unfortunate – especially on such an important case as this for the religious sector. Given the BC Court’s different approach than the Ontario Court – I hope that the long term effect of the Divisional Court’s decision will be limited.
In the meantime, we are now finalizing our documents to be filed in the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal. Justice Jamie S. Campbell, of the lower court in Nova Scotia, ruled in favour of TWU but the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society has appealed that decision as they felt it would limit their promotion of “equality.” Evidently their notion of “equality” fails to include religious equality. As Justice Campbell noted, “The discomforting truth is that religions with views that many Canadians find incomprehensible or offensive abound in a liberal and multicultural society. The law protects them and must carve out a place not only where they can exist but flourish.” Great words of wisdom.