<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="https://publishpress.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CCCC BlogsWhat’s Happening With Bill S-222? - CCCC Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://cccc.org/news_blogs/legal/2021/06/30/whats-happening-with-bill-s-222/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/legal/2021/06/30/whats-happening-with-bill-s-222/</link>
	<description>CCCC Blogs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 16:28:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-CA</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">44556325</site>	<item>
		<title>What’s Happening With Bill S-222?</title>
		<link>https://cccc.org/news_blogs/legal/2021/06/30/whats-happening-with-bill-s-222/</link>
		<comments>https://cccc.org/news_blogs/legal/2021/06/30/whats-happening-with-bill-s-222/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 18:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deina Warren]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Direction and Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/?p=32271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Remember Bill S-222? It proposes to amend the Income Tax Act in a way that would eliminate the “own activities” test, allow resource transfers, and move from “direction and control” to “reasonable steps” to ensure resources are used for only charitable purposes. For a full review of the bill, check... <a href="https://cccc.org/news_blogs/legal/2021/06/30/whats-happening-with-bill-s-222/" class="linkbutton">More</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cccc.org/news_blogs/legal/2021/06/30/whats-happening-with-bill-s-222/">What’s Happening With Bill S-222?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cccc.org/news_blogs">CCCC Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Remember <a href="https://parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/43-2/bill/S-222/third-reading" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill S-222</a>? It proposes to amend the <em>Income Tax Act</em> in a way that would eliminate the “own activities” test, allow resource transfers, and move from “direction and control” to “reasonable steps” to ensure resources are used for only charitable purposes. </p>



<p>For a full review of the bill, check out this post, <a href="https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/noteworthy/2021/02/10/bill-s-222-from-direction-and-control-to-reasonable-steps/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill S-222: From Direction and Control to Reasonable Steps</a> (10 February 2021).</p>



<p>Where is S-222 now? And what&#8217;s next?</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Stage in the Parliamentary Process</h2>



<p>The Bill was introduced in the Senate in February 2021. It <a href="https://sencanada.ca/en/content/sen/chamber/432/debates/051db_2021-06-17-e?language=e#50" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">passed third (final) reading</a> at the Senate on June 17 without any amendments being made to the bill. The sponsoring Senator highlighted the bill’s two objectives:</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow"><p>First, it provides accountability; and second, it provides for empowering partnerships. It is not an ‘either-or.’ Accountability and empowerment, and accountability and partnerships, are not mutually exclusive concepts.</p></blockquote>



<p>On June 23, S-222 moved to the House of Commons for <a href="https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/en/43-2/house/sitting-124/hansard#Int-11417258" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">first reading</a>. Speaking to the bill, an MP explained that the bill would:</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow"><p>…fix a problem due to the archaic legislation in the Income Tax Act that restricts the ability of Canadian charities to do good work around the world.</p></blockquote>



<p>The MP went on to describe how it will reduce “bureaucracy and redundancy” while at the same time providing “greater accountability” and “giving charities in Canada the ability to do greater work.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A Petition</h2>



<p>Before the House <a href="https://twitter.com/HoCChamber/status/1407813316551057412">adjourned for the summer</a> a <a href="https://petitions.ourcommons.ca/en/Petition/Details?Petition=432-01188">petition was tabled</a> in the House of Commons calling on the government to take action by:</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list" type="1"><li>Replacing the “original regime and ‘own activity’ test in the ITA that requires registered charities to devote all of their resources to charitable activities carried on by themselves with a regime that permits registered charities to operate in furtherance of their charitable purpose; and</li><li>Replace current administration requirements around ‘direction and control’ with a requirement for registered charities to establish reasonable and practical parameters for ensuring resource accountability when working to achieve a charitable purpose through a third party that is not a qualified donee.”</li></ol>



<p>The petition was by paper only and not posted for electronic signature. It may be that when the next session begins (bearing in mind the rampant election speculation!) a similar petition can be revived and tabled when the House comes to debate S-222.  </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What&#8217;s Next?</h2>



<p>It&#8217;s hard to say what&#8217;s next. If an election is called, S-222 may die on the order paper. That means another bill – identical or similar in substance – would have to be introduced after the <a href="https://www.ourcommons.ca/About/OurProcedure/ParliamentaryCycle/c_g_parliamentarycycle-e.htm#3" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">opening of a newly elected Parliament</a>, meaning the process would start all over. If no election is called, the House can pick up where it left off and the process will resume. Only time will tell. </p>



<p>In the meantime, members interested in the topic can hop over to The Green where there&#8217;s a dedicated <a href="https://thegreen.community/t/bill-s222/3376" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">space for discussion</a> about direction and control.</p>

<div id='jp-relatedposts' class='jp-relatedposts' >
	<h3 class="jp-relatedposts-headline"><em>Related</em></h3>
</div><p>The post <a href="https://cccc.org/news_blogs/legal/2021/06/30/whats-happening-with-bill-s-222/">What’s Happening With Bill S-222?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cccc.org/news_blogs">CCCC Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://cccc.org/news_blogs/legal/2021/06/30/whats-happening-with-bill-s-222/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">32271</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
